SEC hints at upcoming revisions to disclosure of executive compensation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently held a roundtable to address concerns regarding executive compensation disclosure requirements. SEC Chair Paul Atkins described the existing rules as a “Frankenstein patchwork” that needs clarification and simplification, sentiments echoed by Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda. This roundtable marked the beginning of a comprehensive review of the rules outlined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K, originally implemented in 1992 and last updated in 2006 with the introduction of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Following the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, the SEC incorporated new directives, such as the Say-on-Pay vote, CEO Pay Ratio, Pay Versus Performance disclosure, and rules governing the clawback of improperly awarded compensation. One key point of discussion was whether the Item 402 disclosure requirements should align more closely with the decision-making processes of corporate boards and compensation committees when designing executive compensation. There was also debate on the effectiveness of Pay Versus Performance disclosure and its relevance to investors compared to the resources companies invest in its preparation.

Participants in the roundtable proposed alternative ways to present compensation information, including revising or eliminating certain compensation tables and replacing them with disclosures that illustrate target compensation decisions alongside actual performance outcomes. Another contentious issue discussed was perquisites, with differing opinions on how these benefits should be disclosed. Some advocated for a detailed disclosure approach, while others suggested raising the aggregate disclosure threshold of $10,000 per fiscal year and re-evaluating which benefits should be classified as perquisites, especially regarding executive security benefits.

To gather input from the public, the SEC is currently accepting comments on executive compensation disclosure. Submissions can be made in various forms, including paper, email, or electronically. It is expected that these public comments will shape the SEC’s next steps, potentially leading to the issuance of a concept release or a proposal for new rules.

This information is shared by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and its affiliates for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal advice and is classified as advertising under applicable state laws.