Judge: Inmates’ forced labor by Corrections Dept. is unconstitutional

ncluding the threat or use of segregation and isolation against inmates who refused to work.A spokesperson for the Colorado Department of Corrections mentioned that the CDOC is currently assessing the ruling and its implications. The spokesperson emphasized the value of the judicial process and stated that the Department of Corrections acknowledges that slavery and forced labor are unethical and illegal. They denied engaging in such practices based on their interpretation of the law. However, the individuals who initiated the lawsuit presented a different narrative.One of the plaintiffs, Harold Mortis, shared his experience of being pressured to work in the prison kitchen despite being sick with COVID-19. Mortis recounted how guards insisted that he work eight-hour shifts due to staffing shortages, raising concerns about contracting the virus while on duty. When Mortis expressed his reluctance to take on the assignment and requested alternative work options, he was met with threats of removal from the incentive living program as a consequence. After challenging the decision, he faced a penalty of two days of earned time being revoked, resulting in a prolonged stay in prison for refusing to comply. Mortis and another inmate involved in the lawsuit highlighted that their parole eligibility dates were pushed back, and they faced punitive measures and placement in more restrictive living quarters for declining work assignments.The ruling from Judge Wallace specified that the state and the Department of Corrections must cease using tactics such as segregation and isolation as a means to compel inmates to work. Additionally, the judge called for an end to the practice of “double charging” when individuals refuse to participate in work activities. The CDOC spokesperson reiterated the department’s commitment to offering programs that equip inmates with essential skills, vocational training, and rehabilitation opportunities to facilitate their successful reintegration into society. Despite the ruling finding the CDOC in violation of the state constitution, the spokesperson maintained that the department has upheld the principles outlined in the Colorado Constitution and expressed uncertainty about the possibility of an appeal.The outcome of this lawsuit sheds light on the complexities of the prison system and the treatment of incarcerated individuals. It underscores the importance of respecting human rights and labor laws within correctional facilities. As the legal proceedings continue, it remains crucial to ensure that the rights and well-being of all individuals, including those in custody, are protected and upheld in accordance with the law.