2025 Recap: New Bedford addresses waste, tackles rodent issue, and aims for cleaner harbor

The year 2025 in New Bedford has been a mix of challenges and victories in terms of environmental issues. Despite being an environmental justice community, New Bedford continues to face the burden of industrial pollution and waste. This year, residents of New Bedford successfully fought against a trash fire on Shawmut Avenue, tackled rat control issues, and voiced their opinions on a waste transfer station proposal. While residents enjoyed the beaches, the city focused on improving its sewer system to prevent stormwater and sewage overflow into the harbor during heavy rains.

The New Bedford Board of Health rejected a waste transfer station proposal in the Far North End, marking a significant win for the community. Environmental activists raised concerns about the proposed facility, arguing that waste transfer stations only shift the problem of waste management without providing a long-term solution. The announcement of the Crapo Hill Landfill reaching capacity within five years added urgency to the waste management issue. Despite the Greater New Bedford Regional Refuse District’s plans to expand the landfill and extend its lifespan, many residents remained opposed to the waste transfer station proposal.

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection approved the waste transfer station project in July, leading to intense public hearings and opposition from the community. Residents attended meetings in large numbers, expressing their concerns about traffic, fire safety, rodent control, and air quality. The Board of Health eventually denied the project in September, citing these concerns and the impact on residents’ quality of life.

Residents like Betty Saulnier, who lived near the proposed project, were relieved by the Board of Health’s decision. Activist Wendy Morrill commended the community’s effort and engagement throughout the process, acknowledging the emotional toll it took on everyone involved. Despite the denial, South Coast Renewables, LLC appealed the decision in October, with the Conservation Law Foundation joining as a third-party intervener to represent residents opposed to the project. If the appeal is successful, the project will bypass the Board of Health and go directly to the city Planning Board.

Throughout the review process, residents and health officials questioned the accountability of South Coast Renewables to fulfill their promises and protect residents’ quality of life. The waste transfer station proposal sparked a spirited debate in New Bedford, highlighting the community’s commitment to environmental sustainability and the well-being of its residents. The efforts of residents and activists in opposing the project demonstrate the power of grassroots activism and community engagement in shaping environmental policies and decisions.