Elon Musk sued by lawyers for rejecting job applications due to DOGE

A lawsuit has been filed against Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Ramaswamy, who was supposed to co-lead the agency with Musk, allegedly faced private undermining prior to DOGE’s formation, leading to tension within the team.

Furthermore, a law firm has raised concerns about the legality of DOGE, asserting that it does not comply with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). This law firm claims that DOGE must adhere to FACA regulations, as it operates similarly to a federal advisory committee.

Ramaswamy expressed disappointment over being sidelined by Musk and other members of the team, following his significant role in the presidential administration’s plans. The controversy surrounding DOGE stems from its classification as non-governmental panel, a move that National Security Counselors believe violates FACA regulations.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by attorneys Jerald Lentini and Joshua Erlich, targets Musk and Trump as co-defendants for their alleged breach of FACA guidelines. Lentini and Erlich cite unanswered job applications to DOGE as a direct violation of FACA’s requirement for membership balance, meeting minutes, public attendance, and congressional disclosure.

Despite Musk’s assertion that DOGE is not a federal advisory committee, Ramaswamy’s actions suggest otherwise. The dispute has escalated to legal action due to discrepancies between DOGE’s operations and FACA’s stipulations regarding advisory committees.

In summary, the lawsuit against DOGE raises questions about its formation and classification, highlighting the need for adherence to federal regulations outlined in the FACA. Ramaswamy’s discontent with his treatment within the team and Musk’s defense of DOGE’s status add complexity to the legal battle surrounding the organization’s establishment.